How Do You Solve a Problem Like Low Back Pain?

What do you tell a patient who comes in with low back pain complaining their doctor won't give them a scan?

Why would you reassure them that not getting a scan is the best course of action?

Back Pain Key Points

  • The most common type of low back pain is called 'non-specific low back pain' and accounts for approximately 90% of cases in primary care settings.
  • Less than 2% of people with low back pain have potentially serious spine conditions that will require surgery or medical intervention.
Source: Toward Optimized Practice (TOP) Low Back Pain Working Group. 2015 December. Evidence-informed primary care management of low back pain: Clinical practice guideline. Edmonton, AB: Toward Optimized Practice. Available from: http://www.topalbertadoctors.org/cpgs/885801 (Revised 2017)

Using Best Evidence in Practice

Did you know that Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for low back pain have been around for a while, in many countries, and that they all pretty much say the same thing? I ask because many manual and physical therapists are glaringly unaware of CPGs. It's a knowledge gap, and that makes it a big practice gap as well.

What Does the CPG for LBP Say?

Well, here's a synopsis in graphic format. It's only 11 minutes long so give it a watch: Back Pain CPG Video

Why Should You Care?

Well, that's a good question. You should care because CPGs are recommendations for clinicians about the care of patients with specific conditions. They are ideally based upon the best available research evidence and practice experience. They are updated when and if an accumulation of new evidence comes to light, so in terms of evidence hierarchy, guidelines represent the top of the pyramid.

"The Institute of Medicine defines clinical practice guidelines as "statements that include recommendations, intended to optimize patient care, that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options."

Based on this definition, guidelines have two parts:

  1. The foundation is a systematic review of the research evidence bearing on a clinical question, focused on the strength of the evidence on which clinical decision-making for that condition is based.
  2. A set of recommendations, involving both the evidence and value judgments regarding benefits and harms of alternative care options, addressing how patients with that condition should be managed, everything else being equal."

Source: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-clinical-practice-guidelines

 

What Does This Mean for Your Practice?

Have you ever told a patient they have back pain because of ...
  • Bad posture
  • Trigger points
  • A slipped disc
  • A tight psoas
  • A weak core
  • Ballistic exercise
  • Lifting the wrong way
  • Scoliosis
  • Misalignment
  • LLD
  • A pelvic tilt
  • Lordosis
  • A cross syndrome
  • Tight muscles
  • DDD
  • Visceral lesions
  • Flat feet
  • Fascial adhesions

If you have, or still do, then you are not using best evidence for your patient. You are doing what a great many manual and physical therapists do and simplifying the care of your patient to a point where that care is being compromised.

**The Number 1 Recommendation - Acute Back Pain**

Once red and yellow flags have been considered, of course. Drum roll please ...

Education - "Educate patient that low back pain typically resolves within a few weeks, but that recurrences are common."

**The Number 1 Recommendation - Chronic Back Pain**

Once red and yellow flags have been considered, of course. Drum roll please ...

Education - "Educate patient with a clear diagnosis, advice to stay active and discussion of hurt vs. harm and activity pacing."

The Canadian CPG for Low Back Pain has a synopsis in Appendix I.

For Those Who Touch

For many of us touch is a large part of treatment, but only a small part of the recommendations, which is as an adjunct therapy. So how do we reconcile our hands-on practice with the evidence?

Small Vital Changes

There's no need to stop hands-on work with your patients who are experiencing back pain, but there is a need to change your clinical reasoning and explanations about why you would provide it. Honesty is probably the best policy. If a patient comes to you with back pain and expects you to fix it, then you need to explain why that's not possible and why it would be better if you provided the tools for them to change their own situation.

That doesn't mean you can do nothing for your patient, on the contrary, that means you can offer treatment that will provide them with reassurance, knowledge and a plan for the future. It is a perfect opportunity to offer knowledge and empowerment for your patient.

It's a perfect opportunity for you to provide treatment for a whole person experience.

For Acute and Sub-Acute Pain

Apart from exercise, the recommendations do not suggest manual therapy for acute and sub-acute low back pain. It may possibly be part of a multidisciplinary program, but that is not a given.

However, our medical system isn't all that up to speed with these recommendations or doctors don't really have the time or language to provide the information a patient needs. Often times patients will contact someone they see as knowledgeable in MSK care before they see their doctor. In which case, how can you help and stay within the guidelines?

  • Always review what the person has done so far.
    • What did their doctor say if they went?
    • If their doctor advised a scan in the absence of red flags ask why.
    • Are there red flags that you see? Do you need to refer?
  • Review and or advise self-care strategies like heat or ice, a combination of rest and tolerated movement.
  • Reassure the patient that most episodes of low back pain resolve on their own and treatment is generally conservative.
  • Review yellow flags (see guidelines for a list of yellow flags and recommendations).
    • Does your patient believe that if it hurts it must be causing harm?
  • Address the yellow flags that are in your scope.
    • Provide reassurance, and if necessary evidence, that pain is a protective system and movement is safe.
  • Give your patient reasonable timelines for feeling better and address the possibility that pain during recovery may be variable.
  • Be honest about manual treatment.
    • Good effects are usually temporary, but may help relieve some symptoms.
    • Positive post-treatment effects may help calm a protective response allowing easier movement with less pain.
      • In which case, encourage mobility within tolerance levels.
      • Depending on the stage of recovery, encourage increasing activity.
    • Hands-on treatment is not a panacea, it should be one part of an overall plan.
      • Ask them about their plan.
  • Provide or modify exercises for home care.
  • Don't recommend more treatment when there is no reason.
    • If the patient finds hands-on work helps with compensation aches and pains then provide a plan that will be optimal for their goals.
For Chronic Pain

The recommendations for chronic low back pain consider massage therapy an adjunct treatment or additional option. Massage and hands-on work are not considered primary or first-line treatments for chronic back pain. Yet, we often see patients with chronic low back pain who are looking for help. Those patients have been to their doctor many times, they have tried different medications and seen many therapists who have provided them with problems (see above list) and supposed solutions for those problems. What is common though is that these patients have had with very little sage, evidence-informed advice and an honest recovery picture. So how can you help?

  • Always review what the person has done so far.
    • What did their doctor say if they went?
    • If their doctor advised a scan in the absence of red flags ask why.
    • Are there red flags that you see? Do you need to refer?
    • What other therapies have been tried and did the patient find them helpful or not?
  • Reassure the patient that most chronic low back pain does not require invasive procedures.
    • Provide evidence if needed.
  • Review yellow flags (see guidelines for a list of yellow flags and recommendations).
    • Does your patient believe that if it hurts it must be causing more harm?
    • Have they stopped activities?
    • Are their ADLs being affected by pain?
  • Address the yellow flags that are in your scope.
    • Provide reassurance, and if necessary evidence, that pain is a protective system and movement is safe.
  • Give your patient reasonable timelines for feeling better and address the possibility that pain during recovery may be variable.
  • Be honest about manual treatment.
    • Good effects are usually temporary, but may help relieve some symptoms.
    • Positive post-treatment effects may help calm a protective response allowing easier movement with less pain.
      • In which case, encourage mobility that does not increase pain, even if it doesn't resolve the pain.
      • Encourage grading and pacing activities.
      • Provide information on flare-up episodes.
        • Management strategies.
        • They are not indicative of more damage.
    • Hands-on treatment is not a panacea, it should be one part of an overall plan.
      • Ask them about their plan.
      • Provide an idea of what a plan might look like.
      • Provide activity or other treatment options that could be part of the plan (see guideline for recommendations).
  • Provide or modify exercises for home care when relevant.
    • Reassure that movement is safe.
    • Help them to use pain as a guide so they can manage on their own.
  • Don't recommend more treatment when there is no reason.
    • Have clear boundaries around what you can and cannot provide.
    • If the patient finds hands-on work helps with compensation aches and pains then provide a plan that will be optimal for their goals.
  • Always work toward liberating your patient from "needing" hands-on therapy to manage their pain.

Clinical Applications of Pain Science

Eric Purves, RMT, BSc. from BC and I have put together a course series called Clinical Applications of Pain Science. The information in these courses is targeted to either a general or specific audience. In Guelph it's for RMTs specifically. In Toronto we welcome all manual and physical therapists. There will be more to come.

These courses will include applying what we know about pain science within an evidence-informed framework that includes CPGs by using case studies, discussions and practice interviews. We hope you can join us.

Find out more about these and other evidence-based continuing education courses.